Need help in clarifying Gotta Snatch them all exercise

Yeah, I like the suggested wording too. I think it is clearer.

I agree as well! It makes more sense to make a trade that benefits all parties hahaha

Great, sounds like a plan then.

@kshekabhi if you want to have a stab at updating the exercise for this change Iā€™d be happy to leave it to you! If not, I can do it myself. :slight_smile:

Sure, I will update the doc @sanderploegsma

I opened a PR to address this here: gotta-snatch-em-all: change task to use symmetric set difference by sanderploegsma Ā· Pull Request #2795 Ā· exercism/java Ā· GitHub

Hi, thanks for making this change.
As this change affects one test case, I should see the solution I submitted previously failing, right? But I donā€™t see that. I guess that is because in the PR, the ā€œNo important files changedā€ action has been checked. Could you explain why?

I think this change affects the implementation of the main ā€œcanTradeā€ method & so needs rerunning tests.