Yeah, I like the suggested wording too. I think it is clearer.
I agree as well! It makes more sense to make a trade that benefits all parties hahaha
Great, sounds like a plan then.
@kshekabhi if you want to have a stab at updating the exercise for this change Iād be happy to leave it to you! If not, I can do it myself.
I opened a PR to address this here: gotta-snatch-em-all: change task to use symmetric set difference by sanderploegsma Ā· Pull Request #2795 Ā· exercism/java Ā· GitHub
Hi, thanks for making this change.
As this change affects one test case, I should see the solution I submitted previously failing, right? But I donāt see that. I guess that is because in the PR, the āNo important files changedā action has been checked. Could you explain why?
I think this change affects the implementation of the main ācanTradeā method & so needs rerunning tests.