If the tests get updated, they should be updated to adopt what is in the problem specs. New versions of tests should match the spec unless there is a really good reason why they shouldn’t.
However, my question is, should we update the tests or the would it be easier to update the instructions? As far as I know, we use .append to modify problem-specifications exercise instructions. But in this case, we have to cut out this line.
I would go with updating the tests to match the problem specs, even if that means breaking existing solutions. However, I’m not a maintainer on this track.
Could you open the PR? I’ve pushed the commit modifying the example solution, but perhaps it needs to be reopened for the new commit to show up on the PR.
I’m not sure who the CoffeeScript maintainer is. Most of the recent PRs seems to be merged by Erik.
My bad, I had assumed you were a Python maintainer since you’ve been pretty active there. For what it’s worth, these are the launched but now-unmaintained tracks I see using PyGithub.
@safwansamsudeen I didn’t save the error message and since the error is fixed now and the tests run smoothly again it’s difficult to reproduce the error message. I’ll try to reproduce it, but basically the test run threw an error regarding an untermitated string and pointed to the line of the “forced question” test.