Correct tests for game-of-life exercise

Programming Haskell
1
2

Please don’t make spurious changes. If there is nothing wrong with the test, they don’t need “correcting”.

3

Unfortunately CI failed so this change was necessary.

1 Like
4

As @tofische said, CI was broken so this was an appropriate PR. I’m not sure “spurious” was a correct way to describe this PR, but maybe I don’t understand what that word means well enough.

1 Like
5

My apologies. Without any context or explaining for what was being corrected, the PR looked like it was changing a name without any reason. It was the second PR in a row without any reason or explanation that changed a name so I mistakenly thought it was spurious.

1 Like
6

No problem, I could have written a better description…