Saw this in a cppcon talk, presented Herb Sutter himself where he described it as using “the typescript model” (building on top of language while maintain full compatibility) for C++.
Cpp2 aims to be another “skin” for C++ itself, just a simpler and safer way to write ordinary C++ types/functions/objects, and a faster way to experiment with proposals for future new Standard C++ features in a simpler compiler and syntax flavor.
I’m very interested in that kind of track. I had the urge to see a carbon track as well, but never had the time to follow if the “c++ skins” have any real skin in the game. Carbon is still not useable and it has been like 4+ years now.
From my experience with building the sqlite track, I see the test-runner as the main hurdle to starting a new track.
Is there a test-framework that can be used? If not, you have to write your own implementation, and that can be tricky. It is not a hindrance, other tracks like GDScript are doing it right now.
if the “c++ skins” have any real skin in the game. Carbon is still not useable and it has been like 4+ years now.
I am not sure about cppfront, there is like an 8 part series of talks on it and it looks usable but I haven’t used it before. I made this post mostly out of curiosity.
Is there a test-framework that can be used? If not, you have to write your own implementation, and that can be tricky. It is not a hindrance, other tracks like GDScript are doing it right now.
Is there a reason why the C++ test framework cannot be used?
It might work. Tracks are built by volunteers. Typically someone who is familiar with the language and tooling steps forward to build a track - or someone willing to put in the time to figure it all out. The Exercism staff doesn’t build tracks.