Hi,
I updated expected_results.json to follow version 3 rules, ensuring schema compliance (“version”: 3, correct status field). I validated the changes against your test logic and all minimal requirements for the current runner.
Added config files
made changes in run.sh file
Please review and let me know if you need more detailed expected results, or if this change addresses core compatibility.
Thanks!
Thanks @Adithyan1919 (and @IsaacG)
I haven’t got capacity to review right now, but will endeavour to do so later this week if I can (I haven’t reviewed the test specs for some time so will need to revisit the docs and refresh my memory). If there’s another maintainer who’s able to review this I’d welcome it.
Hey, I need to read what are the new requirements for runner version 3 as well.
However, quick question is if scripts for different languages shouldn’t be very similar and we need to only adjust some specifics (like paths)?
That way we introduce the same bugs and mitigate them once everywhere not reinventing the wheel.
Possible that test runners are very specific to the language but that’s what I would like to know from someone more knowledgable in other tracks.
I’ll do what I can, but unfortunately I know approximately nothing about the r-test-runner repo or the test specs.